Racionalizacijski hrček

[slovenc79]

izbire imamo vsi enako. tradicionalno smo ženske v prednosti v mlajših letih, moški ste pa v zrelejših.

tradicionalno so starejši ljudje v zvezah, mlajši pa ne

če mi ne verjameš, pojdi na kakšno dating spletno stran. v par dneh boš dobila trimestno število ponudb za karkoli.

[Džeki]

izbire imamo vsi enako. tradicionalno smo ženske v prednosti v mlajših letih, moški ste pa v zrelejših.

Med moškim in moškim je razlika. Dvomim, da bo kakšen tip, ki kot mlad nič ne upa glede žensk, kadarkoli v prednosti napram tebi.

[claire]

Vau kakšna čast, da se je v moj komentar vtaknila najpametnejša punca na cosmo forumu... Sicer ne vem ali so ti od vseh silnih faksov in 500 predavanj zablokirali možgani, da nisi razumela preproste stvari, ki sem jo želela povedat. oh.

naravnost obožujem to tipično (slovensko) foušijo!

nč bat za moj mozeg, po "vseh silnih faksih" in "5oo predavanjih" še zmerom zazna idiotizme o tem, kako lahko nekdo srčno ljubi njemu neprivlačno osebo.

res se mi ne da tolmačit.

podarjam ti medaljo. ker meni, da je tip neprivlačen, ma ni šans, da se me dotakne. to, o čem ti nadalje govoriš, ni neprivlačnost. LOL no. nisem ti jaz kriva, če se ne znaš izražat. mogoče bi blo fajn it na kako predavanje, naret kaki fax...
al pa preprosto dat nekaj na svoj videz in se nehat počutit neprivlačno...

[Ananhas]

^^ Ne samo pametna... tudi smisel za humor ima.

[TLDR]

Znanost pravi, da hrček obstaja:

"Reverse Frontostriatal Connectivity" is the neurobiological term for the Rationalization Hamster:
Women and men differed in the brain mechanisms that enabled self-controlled decisions. During self-control men showed a stronger decrease in some limbic regions than women. An increased frontostriatal coupling helped men to control immediate reward desiring. Women showed the reverse frontostriatal connectivity during a ‘desire-reason dilemma’.

Translation: Men use reason to override their feelings. Women use feelings to override their reason.

This would help expain why it is difficult to utilize logic to convince a woman of anything. The more you succeed in convincing her, the more she will be inclined to amp up her feelings in order to counteract that success. Applying logic to the science, this suggests a more successful strategy would be to simply skip the logical process entirely and go straight to making an appeal to her emotions

In pa še kako na to zadevo gleda neka ženska:
"The rationalization hamster is that part of your brain that runs at full speed but never goes anywhere. It's the mechanism for denial and justification. Whatever you want to believe, it's your hamster that finds a way to make your belief "true," in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It's mantra is "Yes, but...)

Men have hamsters too, but since they're not nearly as sheltered from the consequences of their beliefs, men tend to maintain better control over their hamsters. Men usually have to learn from their mistakes. Women, not so much"

[Sarissima]

This would help expain why it is difficult to utilize logic to convince a woman of anything.

JS hočem videt to tvojo "znanost". Ne pa da mi bullshitaš okoli neke kvazi "znanstvene" tekste, ki so v resnici spet pobrani z nekega povprečnega bloga. Nehaj ctrl+c, ctrl+v nekega zagrenjenega bednika, ki ti z "logiko" (ki jo vi uber pametni moški seveda tako odlično razumete) pere možgane.

[Tulip]

Hoj TLDR... mene pa zanima kaj boš imel od preučevanja teh zadev?

Ker mislim, da moramo tako moški kot ženske delati na sebi, drugih spreminjat/kontrolirat ne moreš, zato je mogoče edino smiselno, da se osredotočiš nase.

[TLDR]

@Sarrisima: big denial, sej vem. sicer pa te stvari niso pobrane s kr enega bloga, ampak heartiste bloga. maš pa to tematiko prisotno po celem googlu, pa tudi izven njega, v vsakdanjiku se ta tematika obravnava pod imenom "ženska logika".

Tulip: seveda, da ne moreš, lahko pa to koristiš sebi v prid.

[s0nckic4]

^ in kako ti to v praksi uspeva?